If you want to spend almost $100,000 a year to turn your son or daughter into a radical, America-hating extremist whose goal is to bring down our republic, particularly our supposedly white supremacist legal system, then the University of Michigan Law School is the place to go.
This is the last article of a 10-part series that J. Christian Adams and I started over six months ago to expose the radical curricula of the nation’s top 10 law schools, as rated last year by U.S. News & World Report.
Adams covered the top-ranked school, Yale, then Chicago, Harvard, NYU, and Cal Berkley. I covered No. 2, Stanford, and also Columbia, Penn, UVA, and now the University of Michigan. As my partner on this project has said, if you’ve missed any of the madness catalog, click a link.
UMich is just as bad as the other law schools, if not worse.
None of this is surprising, given the news about student organizations at various colleges, including law students, supporting Hamas terrorists and their murder, rape, or kidnapping of hundreds of Israeli civilians. It reminds one of the way the infamous, antisemitic German American Bund of the 1930s supported the Nazis.
Law students at three of the law schools we have covered—Harvard, NYU, and Columbia—have had law firms’ job offers withdrawn because of their support for these terrorists.
No shock that the University of Michigan has such groups, too, like the Young Democratic Socialists of America, which applauds Hamas’ killing spree as the “revolutionary will of the people,” and Students Allied for Freedom and Equality, which calls on others to “honor our martyrs” and “resist imperialism.”
Given the militantly leftist curricula and faculty at those schools, student support for Hamas is no surprise. The only surprise is the politically correct Big Law culture actually doing the right thing and canceling job offers to students who have neither the character nor the fitness to practice law.
If you are going to attend UMich, you had better be prepared to agree, as stated by the law school’s Advisory Board on Race and Racism, that there is “systemic, institutional racism and discrimination within the Quad.”
According to the law school’s interdisciplinary Program in Race, Law, and History, its work “is grounded in scholarship that has established race as at the core of interpreting the history of the Americas.” Apparently, race drives everything we do in “religion, culture, labor, biology, and politics,” which is why we, as a society, have “rationalized profound inequality.”
Speaking of biology, law school administrators obviously need a basic lesson in biology, since their 2025 class profile says that 1% of the class are neither men nor women but “nonbinary or other genders.” Maybe they should add another category for the class profile, labeled “confused.”
Of course, UMich knows all about racist behavior since it has been one of the leading law schools in promoting race-based admissions for decades. Under the heading of “Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Information,” the school brags about its leading role in Grutter v. Bollinger, the 2003 Supreme Court decision that approved the law school’s racial preference admissions policy in the name of “diversity.”
The law school criticizes the voters of Michigan for approving the 2006 proposition outlaweing such preferences, and the president of the university, Santa Ono, issued a statement after the Supreme Court finally ruled against such discrimination in the Harvard/University of North Carolina cases expressing how “deeply disheartened” she was by the ruling—no doubt as disheartened as George Wallace was by the high court’s Brown v. Board of Education ruling.
Ono brags about the university’s “diversity, equity,and inclusion strategic plan, DEI 1.0,” and development of its “next strategic plan, DEI 2.0.” Those are code words for discrimination, exclusion, and indoctrination.
This perverse, distorted view of America and the law pervades the coursework at UMich. The class on “Critical Race Theory” will brainwash—sorry, I mean teach—students that our legal system and laws are “historically central to and complicit in upholding racial hierarchy as well as other hierarchies of gender, class and sexual orientation.”
A similar course, “Race and the Law,” posits that the law “has created and maintained a regime of white supremacy in the United States” and that the course will provide students with “the tools essential to resist that regime.”
Haven’t had enough? You can take “Civil Rights: Slavery & Trafficking,” which among other things, explains the “loopholes” in the 13th Amendment that are “used to justify prison labor.” Bet you didn’t realize that when convicted felons are given the opportunity to work to earn some income and develop skills, that is tantamount to the slavery we fought a Civil War and passed the 13th Amendment to end.
In fact, according to UMich, such modern work programs are “traceable to the convict leasing schemes of the Jim Crow era.” You’ll learn all about “morality, femininity, and whiteness” and “explore race, gender, indigeneity, anti-Blackness … colonialism, globalization, and federalism.”
I am sure that learning all about colonialism will help a fledgling lawyer pursue a tort case for personal injuries, draft a contract for a business client, close a real estate deal, or prosecute someone in a criminal case. Right? Wrong.
Speaking of prosecutions and trying to protect the public from dangerous criminals, don’t expect to get that training at UMich. Instead, you will get “Progressive Prosecution: Law and Policy,” where you will learn how the role of prosecutors isn’t to put away criminals who break the law and victimize the innocent.
No, according to the course description, prosecutors should “see their role as combatting overincarceration, eliminating racial and socioeconomic inequity, and changing a criminal legal system that too frequently exacerbates those inequities.” You will hear all about the “progress” the “progressive prosecutor” movement has made.
Progress? As my Heritage Foundation colleagues Cully Stimson and Zack Smith outline in painful detail in their book “Rogue Prosecutors: How Radical Soros Lawyers Are Destroying America’s Communities,” the progressive prosecutor movement has led to dramatic increases in crime in cities throughout the country where these rogue prosecutors have gotten elected.
The refusal of these rogue prosecutors to prosecute misdemeanors and many felonies, when combined with their push for no-cash bail and no detention for criminals awaiting trial, has devastated urban communities and victimized the very individuals they claim they are trying to help—law-abiding citizens in poor, often majority-minority urban neighborhoods.
And we can’t forget the need to turn law students into environmental justice warriors. For that, you can take “Environmental Justice,” a course that will teach you about the environmental decisions that “disproportionately impact people of color, indigenous peoples, and the poor.” The course will address “environmental racism and other form of environmental injustice.”
No modern socialist training camp would be complete without a course like “Life, Death, Love, and the Law.” This course “will inquire into the ethics of reproduction” including the “choice to have children and the choice to terminate a pregnancy.” The course will “think about death, what it is, whether it is bad.” Wait. What? No, really, that is from the course description.
I don’t think anyone who knows the realities of life and has lost a loved one or a friend needs a law school course to know what death is or whether “it is bad.” Israeli families that have had their loved one tragically murdered also could tell the students at UMich who support Hamas everything they need to know about this topic, too.
Christian Adams and I graduated from law school back when these institutions were still trying to teach their students how to practice law, not indoctrinate them with socialist, racist, anti-American propaganda that defames our legal and justice system and trains them to be revolutionaries who will overthrow our system.
Going through the course catalogs and programs of the supposedly best law schools in the country has been quite depressing.
As Adams said in our first article, these schools no longer are trying to produce “lawyers capable of helping clients” with practical legal problems. They’re churning out a generation of lawyers with contempt for our Constitution and the rule of law, who will “destroy treasured American institutions such as tolerance, liberty, and free speech.”
The only piece of advice we have for students is this: Quit looking at the elite, expensive law schools and thinking they will somehow turn you into a competent, highly professional lawyer, and that you need to go there to get a good job.
These schools won’t make you good lawyers, and the “education” you’ll receive is probably not worth the exorbitant amount you’ll pay for it. There are many other fine law schools, including many state schools, that are far more affordable and have not yet become socialist training camps. Do well there, and you’ll be able to get hired.
Not only will you get a better education at those other law schools, but you also actually might get through them without being persecuted for being a patriot who believes in the Constitution. Or for rejecting the racist, elitist political orthodoxy that passes for normal in woke law schools that coast on their past reputations for excellence and masquerade as institutions of higher learning.
This commentary originally was published by PJ Media
Have an opinion about this article? To sound off, please email letters@DailySignal.com and we’ll consider publishing your edited remarks in our regular “We Hear You” feature. Remember to include the url or headline of the article plus your name and town and/or state.