New plans for house next to Old Spring Tavern include smaller home farther from street

The owners of a lot next to the historic Old Spring Tavern on the West Side have revised plans to build a home next to the landmark, making the house narrower, reducing its size and pushing it farther from a street.

Since the spring, Jon and Brenda Furlow have been seeking to build a two-story home with a two-car garage on a quarter-acre lot at 3701 Council Crest, behind the mid-1800s Old Spring Tavern at 3706 Nakoma Road near the UW Arboretum. But the couple has faced opposition from some neighbors and historic preservationists concerned that the proposed home is too big for the site.

The new plans come after the Landmarks Commission found the previous proposed house too wide.

“We went back to work with our builder on a redesign,” Jon Furlow said. “We were able to shrink the width of our home by almost 10 feet, as suggested by the commission. We also increased the set-back on Spring Trail to 20 feet from the lot line, which is consistent with the set-back of the tavern home garage complex and likewise addresses the commission’s guidance.”

People are also reading…

The house has been reduced from 4,450 square feet of finished space to 4,218 square feet.

“We then took it a step further and reduced the visual size of our home by changing the gable end roof to a hip roof,” Furlow said. “Overall, we are confident that our redesign meets the commission’s guidance.”

The Madison Trust for Historic Preservation continues to oppose the plans.

“The Madison Trust for Historic Preservation believes that the revised proposal for a new 4,200-square-foot house on the Old Spring Tavern designated landmark property is still much too big for this site,” trust President Richard Chandler said. “Its size and mass would be incompatible with the historic Old Spring Tavern and would irrevocably change the appearance and feeling of the historic open west yard.”

Any new construction proposed within the boundary of a designated landmark property, which includes both lots, requires review by the Landmarks Commission. No other city committees, boards or commissions would be involved. Any development on a landmark site also must comply with the federal Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation.

The Landmarks Commission is scheduled to consider the revised plans on Nov. 6.







Proposed house by landmark

Rendering of a proposed 4,218-square-foot house, right, on a slope next to the landmark Old Spring Tavern on the West Side.




The former tavern was built just before the start of the Civil War and used as a stagecoach stop for travelers to and from western Wisconsin. The building was converted from a tavern and hotel into a private residence in 1895, and the grounds surrounding it were named a city landmark in 1972 and listed on the National Register of Historic Places in 1974. The tavern lot and vacant lot are part of the landmark site.

The Furlows, who lived on Oneida Place in Nakoma for 22 years, moved to Minneapolis for job-related reasons in 2015, but are now in a position to relocate back to Madison and bought the lot at 3701 Council Crest to return to the Nakoma neighborhood.

In late April, the couple submitted an application for a Certificate of Appropriateness for the project, withdrew it in mid-May and then reapplied for essentially the same house but with an improved stormwater management plan. City Preservation Planner Heather Bailey had recommended approval of the project.

In mid-August, the Landmarks Commission endorsed the architectural style and height of the new structure and voiced appreciation for the lengths taken to preserve a historic black walnut tree and designing the landscaping to direct the stormwater runoff away from the tavern building. But the commission also deemed the structure as too wide and asked the Furlows for revised plans.

Now, the Furlows believe they’ve responded to the commission’s requests and have submitted a new drainage plan that again shows that construction of the proposed home would reduce the surface water runoff toward the tavern home property in every case from a one-year, 24-hour storm to a 500-year, 24-hour storm.

“We remain enthusiastic about returning to Nakoma,” Furlow said. “The vast majority of neighbors who’ve reached out have been very supportive. We’ve even made some new friends in the neighborhood — people who moved in since we left but have now reached out welcoming us back.”

But the historic preservation trust is still unconvinced.

“The proposed new house would still overshadow the Old Spring Tavern due to its much larger mass, higher roofline, and location only 26 yards from the front door of the historic building,” Chandler said. “The proposed new building is 10 feet narrower than the original proposal that the Landmarks Commission rejected but is otherwise substantially the same.”

The trust is encouraging all commissioners to personally view the property to fully understand the negative impact that the proposed large new house would have on the landmark, he said.

Bailey has not completed an updated staff recommendation on the revised proposal.

Get Insightful, Cutting-Edge Content Daily - Join "The Neo Jim Crow" Newsletter!

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Get Insightful, Cutting-Edge, Black Content Daily - Join "The Neo Jim Crow" Newsletter!

We don’t spam! Read our [link]privacy policy[/link] for more info.

Get Insightful, Cutting-Edge, Black Content Daily - Join "The Neo Jim Crow" Newsletter!

We don’t spam! Read our [link]privacy policy[/link] for more info.

This post was originally published on this site